Development


Warning: Patch hash format changed (breaking change) (9)

The patch hashes are currently base64-encodings of the SHA2-512 of the patch as written in binary. This is not optimal, especially when we need to copy-paste hashes (which does not happen very often for me). I was thin…

About the Development category (1)
Redmine integration (2)
Bad performance (10)
Patching patches (20)
Using rustfmt systemically ( 2 ) (28)
Random Talks and Thoughts (19)
Incorporating discussions into the repo itself (6)
Git compatibility (8)
AST-level diffs and merges (8)
A composable pijul user interface? (brainstorm) ( 2 ) (21)
Benchmarking pijul (2)
Last adjustments before Pijul 0.10 (3)
Semantics of "missing contexts" conflicts (7)
Lots of conflicts (7)
Getting ready for 0.9 (4)
Prepare the release of pijul-0.8 (10)
Writing the patch description from an editor (8)
Heads-up: recent bugs with conflicts and with the Nest (6)
Pre-record hook (7)
Request for comments: Listing files with conflicts in `pijul status` (14)
About warning: using `clone` on a `Copy` type [clone_on_copy] (5)
Spontaneous (non-)branching vs. tree-style branches (10)
Official Reporitories and Official History (19)
Prepare pijul-0.7.0 ( 2 ) (21)
A safe API for sanakirja (5)
Fast characterwise (and binary?) patches (4)
Nest Signup Confirmation Email is Empty (6)
Subcommand show-dependencies (12)
Disk space reduction (6)