# Phenomenological Pijul (or Pijul from the outside)

**URL:** <https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-pijul-from-the-outside/906>\
**Category:** Documentation\
**Created:** [April 8, 2022, 4:51pm UTC](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-pijul-from-the-outside/906 "2022-04-08T16:51:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![manithree](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/discourse.pijul.org/manithree/32/521_2.png) [@manithree](https://discourse.pijul.org/u/manithree)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2023, 3:55pm UTC](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-pijul-from-the-outside/906/3 "2023-05-06T15:55:01Z")

</div>

Thanks. As a long-time git user, that was very informative.

The docs say (more than once, I believe) that pijul channels aren’t needed as often as git branches. But I haven’t found any examples of how I would, for example, work on 2 features and 2 defects simultaneously without mixing any of that, without using channels, and how that would integrate with a CI system. So, if that exists, a pointer to that would be helpful. To me anyway. Or an explanation here.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/phenomenological-pijul-or-pijul-from-the-outside/906)._