# Pijul as an alternative to stacked-git?

**URL:** <https://discourse.pijul.org/t/pijul-as-an-alternative-to-stacked-git/928>\
**Category:** Question\
**Created:** [June 10, 2022, 2:50am UTC](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/pijul-as-an-alternative-to-stacked-git/928 "2022-06-10T02:50:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmeunier](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/discourse.pijul.org/pmeunier/32/4_2.png) [@pmeunier](https://discourse.pijul.org/u/pmeunier)\
**Post date:** [June 10, 2022, 7:17am UTC](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/pijul-as-an-alternative-to-stacked-git/928/3 "2022-06-10T07:17:15Z")

</div>

Also, you’re right to think that Pijul works better for rebases than stacked-git, even though stacked-git is a nice attempt to fix Git. Our main hypothesis here is that Git isn’t really fixable, because merges solve the wrong problem.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.pijul.org/t/pijul-as-an-alternative-to-stacked-git/928)._